About This Site: Method, Editorial Rules and Limits

This site is a decision aid for a narrow question: which attraction ticket should you actually buy. It is not a destination guide, not a deal site, and not a merchant blog. Each guide exists because the buyer's real blockers at a constrained-inventory attraction are specific — which of several similar-looking products is actually different, whether the premium buys anything, when the thing becomes purchasable, and what the identity or change rules are.

Method#

Start from the operator. Every load-bearing fact is taken from the attraction's own website or its official ticketing portal. Secondary sources — travel blogs, aggregators, forums, review sites — are never used to establish a ticket fact.
Classify each fact by how it decays. A structural rule (that a ticket is nominative, that the lift stops at the terrace level) is written as standing guidance. A price, an opening hour, a sale window or an availability condition is written with the date it was observed and a freshness label.
Where an operator's own pages disagree, both readings are shown and attributed, and the contradiction is named rather than smoothed over.
Where a fact could not be verified from an official source, it is absent. The page says it is unpublished. Nothing is filled in from a reseller, an aggregator, or an older version of this site.

Editorial rules#

Fixed rules applied to every page

No first-hand framing. No "we visited", "we booked", "we tested", "our experience", "when we went". No one on this project has visited these attractions on your behalf.
No invented review ratings, review counts, traveller quotes, queue-length observations or quality rankings.
No price without a source and a date. No price without an operator source at all.
No restated refund terms where the operator's governing document could not be read.
No countdown timers, fake scarcity, fake stock counters or fake urgency devices.
No implication of affiliation with the attractions themselves.
Attraction names used descriptively to identify the subject of a guide.

Known limits of this site#

Some operator prices are not reachable from a machine. Where the official price sits behind a browser check or a script-rendered booking widget, this site publishes no price for it. That is why some tables have a price column and some do not.
Third-party authorisation status is not asserted. For some attractions the operator controls who may sell what. This site does not claim that any named company is authorised or unauthorised unless the operator says so on a page we could read.
Comparison is structural, not experiential. We can tell you what a ticket grants and what its rules are. We cannot tell you whether the queue was long, whether the view was worth it, or whether a particular guide was engaging. Those are questions for recent traveller reports.
Three guides is the cap. This is a deliberate limit, not a shortage of content. A thin comparison page is worse than no page, and a site built to scale thin pages tends to be treated as thin by search engines.

How pages are updated#

Pages are re-checked before any public release and then reviewed monthly while live. Each review updates the Last checked date on every page it touches. When a figure cannot be re-verified, it is removed rather than carried forward on trust. Corrections are made in place; if a correction changes a decision, the page says so.

Found something wrong?#

Corrections are the most useful thing a reader can send. If a figure is out of date, an inclusion is misdescribed, or an official source contradicts a claim here, get in touch and say which page and which figure. Where a genuine error is confirmed, it is corrected and the date moves.